UNDERSTANDING AND REDUCING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT BIAS

Bias and prejudice have existed since ancient times. Most of the documented occurrences of bias describe overt or conscious bias. It is only fairly recently that the concept of implicit bias has been described. In 1995, psychologists Mahzarin Banaji and Anthony Greenwald used the term implicit bias to describe “social behavior [that] often operates in an implicit or unconscious fashion. The identifying feature of implicit cognition is that past experiences influence judgment in a fashion not introspectively known by the actor” (UCC, 2022).

What Is Bias?

Biases are attitudes, behaviors, and actions that are prejudiced in favor of or against a person or group. Implicit bias, also known as unconscious bias, is a form of bias that is both automatic and unintentional. It may include stereotypes, judgments, and assumptions that someone unknowingly believes are true and that may be based on factors such as age, race, weight, gender, gender orientation, sexual orientation, religion, socioeconomic status, or more.

Although people with implicit biases are unaware of their prejudices, these biases may still affect their behaviors and decisions. Another important facet of implicit bias is that it is not only outside of the person’s awareness, but it may directly contradict what they verbalize as their beliefs and values (NIH, 2022; Maryville University, n.d.).

Becoming aware of one’s biases and their potential impacts allows a person to take a proactive role in reducing how biases may impact their decision-making.

DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT BIAS

Explicit bias, also known as conscious bias, is overt and easily recognized. People who have explicit biases are very much aware of their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors, which are typically presented with intent. In its extreme, explicit bias is characterized by “overt negative behavior that can be expressed through physical and verbal harassment or through more subtle means such as exclusion.”

Implicit bias, however, is outside of a person’s awareness. Unlike explicit bias, it can automatically, progressively, and adversely affect behavior in a manner that is not immediately apparent and outside a person’s consciousness (NCCC, n.d.).

Impact of Implicit Bias in Child Welfare

Disparities exist throughout the child welfare system presently and historically. In New York State, OCFS Disproportionate Minority Representation (DMR) data shows that children and families of color are overrepresented in the child welfare system. Families of color have been more likely to have been involved in a report to the SCR. Children of color have been more likely to have been placed in foster care.

The income status of families is also a significant predictor of involvement with the child welfare system. While poverty does not equate to child abuse or maltreatment, families investigated by CPS have several poverty-related risk factors such as unemployment, single parenthood, food insecurity, housing stability, or lack of access to childcare. Families living below the poverty line are three times more likely to be substantiated for child maltreatment (NYS OCFS, 2022).

Strategies to Reduce Implicit Bias

A mandated reporter’s decision to call the SCR can change the course of the life of a child and family members and have long-lasting and devastating impacts on both families and communities. Therefore, it is important for professionals to be aware of the potential for implicit biases and to ensure that such biases do not impact their decision-making. Instead, decisions must be made based on the objective facts of a situation.

A proven strategy to reduce bias and increase awareness regarding one’s own beliefs is to ask oneself the question, would I make a different decision to call the SCR if the child or family in a situation of suspected of child maltreatment or abuse were of a different:

  • Race?
  • Ethnicity?
  • Gender?
  • Gender identity?
  • Sexual orientation or expression?
  • Religion?
  • Immigration status?
  • Primary spoken language?
  • Culture?
  • Age?
  • Neighborhood where they reside?
  • Presence of a disability?
  • Occupation?
  • Socio-economic status of the family?

If the answer is yes, bias may be impacting the decision to call the SCR.

Another strategy when assessing information received about a child and their family is to ask analytical and evaluative questions and use critical thinking. This includes:

  • Identifying the specific concerns about the current situation
  • Gathering adequate information about the current situation
  • Analyzing that information to separate facts from assumptions
  • Recognizing the possibility of bias in one’s personal opinions
  • Developing multiple hypotheses that could explain the situation
  • Determining whether calling the SCR is legally required
  • If not, determining whether an alternative option is better, such as connecting the individual or family to appropriate services in their community

Often, it is possible to support a family without reporting a family to the CPS system. Mandated reporters must approach this responsibility with empathy, compassion, care, and curiosity (NYS OCFS, 2022).

HARVARD IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST

One way to develop self-awareness is through the use of an educational tool. The Harvard Implicit Association Test (IAT) was created in 1998 for the purpose of measuring and detecting a person’s implicit bias. The test can be used to measure biases in relation to race, sexual orientation, gender, age, and various other categories. This test has been found to offer some insight into how groups of people with different traits, behaviors, and cultures are viewed by others.

The IAT takes about 10–15 minutes to complete and can be accessed on the Project Implicit website (see “Resources” at the end of this course). Participants are asked to sort and categorize a variety of images and words and respond to a questionnaire related to the topic. The strength of association between the various types of content is measured based on how quickly the user reacts to the associations (MAEPD System, n.d.). Results are classified as no bias, slight bias, moderate bias, or strong bias toward people of different races, sexual orientations, and other bias-related categories.

The IAT is not a perfect measurement of implicit bias. There are some criticisms, including the fact that people may take the test multiple times and provide different answers or that various issues could influence someone’s reaction time while taking the test. However, the test results are a good way to start introspection and the process of self-awareness (Practical Psychology, 2022).